Which of the following is NOT a beneficial outcome of accurate field notes?

Accurate field notes serve numerous important functions in the context of criminal investigations. They enhance the potential for follow-up investigations by providing detailed documentation of the events and evidence encountered, enabling investigators to build upon the initial findings. Additionally, precise field notes are invaluable in aiding report writing as they ensure that crucial details are captured clearly and effectively, reducing the likelihood of errors and omissions in formal reports.

Moreover, well-maintained field notes can significantly enhance the possibility of a conviction in criminal cases. They provide an official record that can support testimony in court, helping to establish credibility and reliability regarding the events as they occurred.

Contrarily, field notes do not eliminate the need for interviews. Interviews serve a different purpose by gathering additional perspectives and testimonies from witnesses, victims, or suspects, which field notes alone cannot provide. Therefore, this makes it clear that the assertion regarding the elimination of interviews is not a beneficial outcome of accurate field notes.