Which case is associated with the requirement for reasonable suspicion in stops?

The case associated with the requirement for reasonable suspicion in stops is Terry v. Ohio. This landmark Supreme Court decision established that law enforcement officers are permitted to stop and briefly detain a person based on reasonable suspicion that the individual is involved in criminal activity. The Court held that the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution allows for such stops if the officer has a specific and articulable basis for suspecting criminal activity, distinguishing it from the higher standard of probable cause required for an arrest.

Terry v. Ohio is significant as it balances the need for police to protect themselves and others while also considering an individual’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. This case set a precedent for how reasonable suspicion is interpreted and applied in law enforcement practices across the United States.