What does the Miranda v. Arizona case primarily address?

The Miranda v. Arizona case primarily addresses self-incrimination. This landmark Supreme Court decision established that individuals taken into police custody must be informed of their rights prior to any interrogation. These rights, commonly known as "Miranda rights," include the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. The ruling emphasizes that without knowledge of these rights, individuals may unknowingly incriminate themselves during questioning, which would violate the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination. The decision aims to ensure that individuals are aware of their rights and can make informed decisions about whether to speak to law enforcement or seek legal counsel. This foundation is crucial in upholding fair legal processes and protecting the rights of those in custody.