What does Graham vs. Connor protect police officers from?

The ruling in Graham vs. Connor fundamentally established that the reasonableness of a police officer's use of force must be assessed from the perspective of the officer at the moment the force was used, rather than from the perspective of the person who experienced the force. This means that when evaluating whether an officer's actions were appropriate, courts consider the situation as it appeared to the officer, taking into account the rapidly evolving circumstances they face. This perspective is crucial because it acknowledges the high-pressure environment in which law enforcement operates and seeks to prevent retrospective judgments based on the outcomes of their actions rather than the immediate decisions made under stressful conditions.

In this context, the decision aims to provide officers with the understanding that their decisions will be viewed through the lens of urgency and the necessity of responding to threats. This protection helps ensure that officers can perform their duties effectively without fear of legal repercussions based solely on hindsight evaluations.