In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court uphold stop and frisk procedures?

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Terry v. Ohio established the constitutionality of stop and frisk procedures. In this landmark case, the Court ruled that law enforcement officers can conduct a limited search of an individual, known as a "stop and frisk," based on a reasonable suspicion that the person may be armed and dangerous. This decision was rooted in the need to prioritize officer safety during police encounters while balancing an individual's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

In Terry v. Ohio, the Court recognized that the quick, brief stop of an individual does not violate constitutional protections if there is a specific, articulable reason for the officer's suspicion. This decision laid the groundwork for the legal standards governing stop and frisk practices used by law enforcement across the United States. The case is significant because it formally legitimized the practice under specific circumstances, influencing law enforcement procedures and policies thereafter.