In the context of forced confessions, what was determined by the Brown vs. Mississippi case?

The Brown vs. Mississippi case established a crucial precedent regarding the admissibility of confessions obtained through coercion, particularly forced confessions derived from physical violence or intimidation. The Supreme Court ruled that such confessions are inherently unreliable and violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This case emphasized that confessions must be voluntary and free from coercion to be admissible in court, thereby categorizing forced confessions as inadmissible. This ruling has had a lasting impact on law enforcement practices and the legal standards surrounding confessions in criminal proceedings, reinforcing the importance of protecting individual rights against coercive interrogation methods.