In civil law, which is NOT one of the three levels of intent?

In civil law, the three levels of intent are intentional wrongs, negligence, and strict liability. Intentional wrongs involve actions taken with the intent to cause harm or injury to another person. Negligence refers to a failure to exercise reasonable care, leading to unintended harm. Strict liability holds individuals or entities responsible for damages or injuries caused by their actions or products, regardless of intent or fault.

Malpractice, while relevant in civil law, particularly in professional contexts, is not classified as a level of intent. It pertains to a specific type of negligence related to professional standards and conduct, particularly in fields like medicine or law. Therefore, it does not fit within the framework of intent levels, making it the correct answer to the question, as it does not represent a foundational concept of intentionality in legal terms.